關于在短時間內的某幾個人的經過

5.0

類型：劇情地區：法國年份：1959 語言：法語

主演：未知

導演：居伊·德波

更新：2025-02-22 12:02:57

立即播放劇情介紹主演作品

手機電腦在線觀看

播放地址

溫馨提示：各線路更新不同步，可嘗試切換線路查看；如果視頻加載失敗，可刷新頁面或切換線路。請記住本站唯一網址【m.ybrs.com.cn】，以免丟失！

HD中字

HD中字

HD中字

關于在短時間內的某幾個人的經過劇情

　　Voice 1 (male "professional announcer" type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wret 　　Voice 1 (male "professional announcer" type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.　　These people also scorned "subjective profundity". They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.　　Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.　　Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.　　Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.　　The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.　　Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.　　The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole "” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.　　This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.　　The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...　　Voice 2: "Our life is a journey "” In the winter and the night. "” We seek our passage..."?　　Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.　　Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.　　On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.　　Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.　　Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.　　Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.　　Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment "ordinary life"? can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.　　The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.　　What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.　　Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.　　Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.　　Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.　　Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.　　Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.　　Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.　　Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?　　Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.　　Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.　　Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.　　Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation "” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.　　Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.　　Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.　　The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.　　To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?　　Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.　　1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.
歡迎在線觀看電影《關于在短時間內的某幾個人的經過》，本視頻由泡泡影視m.ybrs.com.cn收集自網絡。如果你喜歡《關于在短時間內的某幾個人的經過》，請把它分享給的朋友，有您的支持我們會做的更好。祝親觀影愉快！詳情

主演作品

HD

你的全部

伊莫琴·普茨,布雷特·戈德斯坦,Rebecca Osias,Kadiesha Belgrave,扎威·阿什頓,史蒂芬·克里,Alara-Star Khan,杰米·朗蘭茲,Tariq Rasheed,Nathaniel Christian,Lizzy Mansfield,珍娜·科爾曼,納蒂亞·阿爾比娜,列娃·安德烈瓦伊達,Indi Chowdhury,伊娃·馬格亞
TC

一戰再戰

萊昂納多·迪卡普里奧,西恩·潘,本尼西奧·德爾·托羅,雷吉娜·赫爾,緹雅娜·泰勒,蔡斯·英菲尼迪,伍德·哈里斯,阿拉娜·哈伊姆,D·W·莫菲特,約翰·胡熱那克,莎娜·麥克黑爾,布倫達·洛倫娜·加西亞,特雷西·托德,吉姆·安德森,博格丹·舒米拉斯,約翰·德馬卡斯,馬特·斯波爾尼克,賈斯汀·S·麥克達維特,杰克·特勞特,羅布·戈爾
HD

牧羊人2024

費利克斯·安托萬·杜瓦爾,讓-克洛德·鮑德拉科,呂克·帕倫,帕特里斯·德吉勒姆,尤尼斯·布西夫,亞明·迪布,米歇爾·塔博,讓-菲利普?文森特,勒內·穆特,讓-雅克·西萊斯特,Laura Guyot,Daphnée de Morant,托馬斯?阿爾諾,Piero Brichese,Pierre Baculard,Lionel Escoffier,Julien Valet,Régis Fortino,德爾喬·科普瑞斯基,Gérard Dubouche
HD

但丁之手

奧斯卡·伊薩克,蓋爾·加朵,杰森·莫瑪,阿爾·帕西諾,馬丁·斯科塞斯,杰拉德·巴特勒,約翰·馬爾科維奇,弗蘭科·內羅,路易斯·坎瑟米,薩布麗娜·因帕恰托雷,本杰明·克萊曼汀,洛倫佐·祖佐洛,福圖納多·切林諾,保羅·博納切利,圭多·卡普里諾,洛麗塔·夏馬,杜克·尼科爾森,David Agranov,克勞迪奧·桑塔瑪利亞,朵拉·羅馬諾
HD中字

地窖里的人

威廉·達福,科里·霍金斯,布萊恩·博維爾,安娜·迪奧普,小格什溫·尤斯塔什,馬克·阿諾德,塔馬拉·勞倫斯,帕梅拉·諾姆韋特,Brooke Walter,凱拉·梅克,喬納森·阿賈伊,Lizzie Lomas,納納·詹姆斯,Shellia Kennedy,Olivia Michi Shrenzel,Reed Stokes,Miah Hasselbaink,Josiah Leonardo Kabeya,Michael Brennan

同類型推薦

HD

你的全部

伊莫琴·普茨,布雷特·戈德斯坦,Rebecca Osias,Kadiesha Belgrave,扎威·阿什頓,史蒂芬·克里,Alara-Star Khan,杰米·朗蘭茲,Tariq Rasheed,Nathaniel Christian,Lizzy Mansfield,珍娜·科爾曼,納蒂亞·阿爾比娜,列娃·安德烈瓦伊達,Indi Chowdhury,伊娃·馬格亞
TC

一戰再戰

萊昂納多·迪卡普里奧,西恩·潘,本尼西奧·德爾·托羅,雷吉娜·赫爾,緹雅娜·泰勒,蔡斯·英菲尼迪,伍德·哈里斯,阿拉娜·哈伊姆,D·W·莫菲特,約翰·胡熱那克,莎娜·麥克黑爾,布倫達·洛倫娜·加西亞,特雷西·托德,吉姆·安德森,博格丹·舒米拉斯,約翰·德馬卡斯,馬特·斯波爾尼克,賈斯汀·S·麥克達維特,杰克·特勞特,羅布·戈爾
HD

牧羊人2024

費利克斯·安托萬·杜瓦爾,讓-克洛德·鮑德拉科,呂克·帕倫,帕特里斯·德吉勒姆,尤尼斯·布西夫,亞明·迪布,米歇爾·塔博,讓-菲利普?文森特,勒內·穆特,讓-雅克·西萊斯特,Laura Guyot,Daphnée de Morant,托馬斯?阿爾諾,Piero Brichese,Pierre Baculard,Lionel Escoffier,Julien Valet,Régis Fortino,德爾喬·科普瑞斯基,Gérard Dubouche
HD

但丁之手

奧斯卡·伊薩克,蓋爾·加朵,杰森·莫瑪,阿爾·帕西諾,馬丁·斯科塞斯,杰拉德·巴特勒,約翰·馬爾科維奇,弗蘭科·內羅,路易斯·坎瑟米,薩布麗娜·因帕恰托雷,本杰明·克萊曼汀,洛倫佐·祖佐洛,福圖納多·切林諾,保羅·博納切利,圭多·卡普里諾,洛麗塔·夏馬,杜克·尼科爾森,David Agranov,克勞迪奧·桑塔瑪利亞,朵拉·羅馬諾
HD中字

地窖里的人

威廉·達福,科里·霍金斯,布萊恩·博維爾,安娜·迪奧普,小格什溫·尤斯塔什,馬克·阿諾德,塔馬拉·勞倫斯,帕梅拉·諾姆韋特,Brooke Walter,凱拉·梅克,喬納森·阿賈伊,Lizzie Lomas,納納·詹姆斯,Shellia Kennedy,Olivia Michi Shrenzel,Reed Stokes,Miah Hasselbaink,Josiah Leonardo Kabeya,Michael Brennan
HD國語

夜·上海

本木雅弘,郭品超,塚本高史,西田尚美,竹中直人,李燦森,馮粒,牛犇,大冢忍,和田聰宏,張一白,張歆藝,張雨綺
HD國語

隱武者：大破青龍會

曾廣泉
HD

人之初2024

雷努特·舒爾騰·范·艾查特,吉斯·舒爾騰·范·艾查特,Pia Amofa-Antwi,Daria Fuchs,Julien Genoud,Kaija Ledergerber,David Urankar
HD

今晚不要讓我們去打狗

艾伯絲·戴維茲,Andreas Damm,Zikhona Bali
HD

牧羊人

約翰·特拉沃爾塔,斯蒂文·麥金托什, 米莉·肯特,本·拉德克利夫,西蒙·威爾遜,Luca Slade,Asan N'Jie,Scarlet Grace,Simon Lennon,Olatunji Ayofe,Mario Torella
HD

超越黃線粵語

內詳
HD

泄密者粵語

吳鎮宇,張智霖,佘詩曼,周秀娜,鄭則仕,劉浩龍,張繼聰,李燦森,衛詩雅,楊梓菁,蘇宸褕,林嘉華,譚小環

常見問題

1.請問哪個平臺可以在線免費觀看劇情片《關于在短時間內的某幾個人的經過》？

優酷視頻網友：《關于在短時間內的某幾個人的經過》免vip在線觀看地址 m.ybrs.com.cn/dxtv/66930.html

2.《關于在短時間內的某幾個人的經過》是什么時候上映/什么時候開播的？

騰訊視頻網友：1959年，詳細日期可以去百度百科查一查。

3.《關于在短時間內的某幾個人的經過》主要演員有哪些？

愛奇藝網友：主演未知

4.劇情片《關于在短時間內的某幾個人的經過》有多少集？

電影吧網友：現在是全集已完結

5.手機版免費在線點播《關于在短時間內的某幾個人的經過》有哪些網站？

手機電影網網友：電影天堂網、神馬電影手機端、神馬電影網

6.《關于在短時間內的某幾個人的經過》評價怎么樣？

百度最佳答案：《關于在短時間內的某幾個人的經過》評價很好，演員陣容強大，并且演員的演技一直在線，全程無尿點。你也可以登錄百度問答獲得更多評價。

劇情熱播榜

哈利·波特與魔法

類型：劇情，地區：美國

主演：丹尼爾·雷德克里夫,